PowerPoint Presentation

प्रतिलिपि

1 Marine Environment ᑕᕆᐅᑉ ᐊᕙᑎᖓ Phase 2 Proposal / ᐊᖏᓕᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᒪᓂᖓᓄᑦ 2 ᑐᒃᓯᕋᐅᑦ Public Hearing Iqaluit and Pond Inlet January 2021 ᐃᓄᓕᒫᓂᑦ ᓈᓚᒃᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᐃᖃᓗᖕᓂ ᒥᑦᑎᒪᑕᓕᖕᒥᓗ ᔮᓐᓄᐊᕆ Presentation Overview ᐅᓂᒃᑳᑉ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ Assessment Approach and Overview ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐅᓂᒃᑳᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓᓗ Construction & Operation at Milne Port ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖓᓗ ᕿᙳᐊᓂ ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕ Shipping ᐅᓯᑲᑦᑕᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᖅ Assessment Conclusion ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐅᑎᓄᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᑕᐅᔪᑦ Technical Review Process Summary ᑭᒡᓕᓯᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᕿᒥᕐᕆᓃᑦ ᐅᓂᒃᑳᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓ Summary ᓇᐃᓈᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ 2

2 Assessment Overview ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᔾᔪᑏᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ 3 Assessment Approach Operational Knowledge ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑏᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᐅᔪᑦ Building on past approvals ᐱᕈᐅᕙᓪᓕᐊᓗᑕ ᑭᖑᓂᑦᑎᑦᓂᖅ ᐊᖏᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑎᒍᑦ Multiple environmental impact review processes ᐅᓄᖅᑐᐃᖅᓱᕐᖢᑎᒃ ᐊᕙᑎᐅᑉ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓇᒍᑏᑦ Deep understanding of key risks ᑐᑭᓯᐊᑦᑎᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᑎᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᑕᒪᒃᑯᓂᖓ ᐊᑦᑕᕐᓇᓪᓗᐊᑕᖅᑐᓂᒃ 4

3 Assessment Approach Operational Knowledge ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑏᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᐅᔪᑦ Integration of key learnings as operations grow / ᐃᓕᑕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᐃᓚᓕᐅᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐱᕈᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᑎᓪᓗᒍ Implementation of mitigation and management measures over 6 years ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᑦᑎᓗᓂ ᐋᕿᒋᐊᕈᑕᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᐅᖏᓐᓇᕐᑐᓂᓪᓗ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᓄᑦ 6ᓄᑦ 5 Assessment Approach Inuit Knowledge ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑏᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᖏᑦ Extensive sharing of Inuit knowledge through interviews, workshops, community meetings ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᖓ ᐊᑑᑎᑎᓪᓚᕆᒡᓗᒍ ᐊᐱᖅᓱᐃᓂᒃᑯᑦ, ᐱᓕᕆᖃᑎᒌᖕᓂᒃᑯᑦ, ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂᓪᓗ ᑲᑎᒪᖃᑎᒌᖕᓂᒃᑯᑦ Integrated into baseline information, identification of valued ecosystem components, potential effects characterization and mitigation measures ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐅᑎᓄᑦ ᐃᓚᓕᐅᑎᓗᒋᑦ, ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᒋᐊᓕᓵᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᒋᐊᕐᑦ ᑐᓴᕈᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ, ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᕐᓗᒋᑦ ᐊᓐᓂᕆᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᑦ ᓇᓕᐊᖑᖕᒪᖔᑦ, ᐊᑭᒃᑐᕈᑕᐅᑐᐃᓐᓇᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖏᑦ ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᕈᑏᓪᓗ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᓂᕋᖅᑕᐅᔪᒧᑦ. 6

4 Assessment Approach Inuit Knowledge ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᖅᑯᓯᐅᔪᖅ - ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᓂᖓ Inuit involvement and input into monitoring ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐃᓚᐅᑎᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᐊᒻᒪ ᓂᓪᓕᕐᕕᖃᖅᑎᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ Continuous process leading to operational changes and adaptive management practices ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᖏᓐᓇᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᔪᓄᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᓃᑦ ᐋᖅᑮᒋᐊᕈᓐᓇᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦᓪᓗ ᐊᓚᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᐊᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᓗᒋᒃ No go zones Koluktoo Bay, western shore of Milne Inlet ᐅᐸᒃᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᖏᑦᑐᑦ - ᖁᕐᓗᖅᑐᖅ ᑲᖏᕐᖢᐊ, ᐱᖓᖕᓇᖓᓃᑦᑐᖅ ᓯᒡᔭᖓᓂ ᕿᓐᖑᐊᑕ 40 km set back area from floe edge 40km ᐅᖓᓯᓐᓂᖃᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᓯᓈᓂ 7 Methods of Incorporating IQ into the EIS Science Data Collection IQ helped focus / prioritize baseline data collection Mary River EIS Guideline Development Workshop Mary River IQ Database ( ) Baseline Reports IQ results were coded and provided to discipline leads for integration into baseline reports Mary River IQ Database ( ) Phase 2 Contemporary Land Use Workshops (2015, 2016) IQ in Secondary Literature Resources Issues Scoping IQ helped identify key issues (e.g., caribou movement across the railway) Mary River IQ Database ( ) Phase 2 Contemporary Land Use Workshops (2015, 2016) Community Engagement Activities Effects Assessment Incorporated Inuit perspectives/predictions; addressed key issues identified above Mary River IQ Database ( ) Phase 2 Contemporary Land Use Workshops (2015, 2016) Community Engagement Activities Management Plans (Mitigation And Monitoring) Inuit participation in refining and reviewing key management plans (i.e., shipping and marine mammals) Community Risk Assessment Workshops (2019) Crossing Selection Workshops (2019 ongoing) Inuit Stewardship Plan (life of mine) Community Engagement Activities (life of mine) 8

5 ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᓯᕗᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᖕᓂᒃ ᑖᒃᑯᓄᖓ ᐊᕙᑎ ᐊᑦᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐅᖃᖅᓯᒪᔭᐅᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᑭᒡᓕᓯᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᓯᒪᔭᖏ ᑲᑎᖅᓱᖅᑕᐅᕙᓪᓕᐊᔪᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᑦ ᐃᑲᔪᓚᐅᖅᐳᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖃᐃᓐᓇᖅᑎᓪᓗᑕ / ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᐃᑎᓪᓗᑕ ᓯᕗᓪᓕᐅᑎᓐᓂᐊᖅᑕᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕆᐊᙵᕐᓂᖅ ᖃᓄᐃᒻᒪᖔᑦ ᑭᓱᑐᐃᓐᓇᐃᑦ ᑐᑭᓯᒋᐊᕈᑏᑦ ᓄᐊᑕᐅᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᓄᓘᔭᓕᕆᓂᕐᒥᒃ ᐊᕙᑎ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᑐᐃᓐᓇᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᓄᓘᔮᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᖕᓂᒃ ᑐᖅᑯᐃᕕᒃ ( ) ᐱᒋᐊᕐᕕᖓᓂ ᐅᓂᒃᑳᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓵᖑᓚᐅᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᓴᖅᑭᖅᑐᕕᓃᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᒃᑯᓯᖅᑕᐅᕙᓚᐳᖅᐳᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑐᓂᔭᐅᓪᓗᑎᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖃᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᑦᑐᓂᑦ ᓯᕗᒃᑲᑕᖅᑎᑦᑎᔨᐅᔪᓄᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᑕᐅᒐᔭᕐᒪᑕ ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕆᐊᙵᕐᓂᖅ ᖃᓄᐃᒻᒪᖔᑦ ᑭᓱᑐᐃᓐᓇᐃᑦ ᐅᓂᒃᑳᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᓄᓘᔮᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᖕᓂᒃ ᑐᖅᑯᐃᕕᒃ ( ) ᑭᖑᓪᓕᕐᒥᒃ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᒍᑎᒋᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᓲᖑᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ (2015, 2016) ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᑦ ᐊᓯᖏᖕᓂᒃ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᓂᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᖅ ᐃᓱᒫᓘᑏᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᑦ ᐃᑲᔪᓚᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓗᑎᑦ ᐱᔾᔪᑕᐅᓪᓗᐊᖅᑐᑦ (ᐆᑦᑑᑎᒋᓗᒍ, ᑐᒃᑐᐃᑦ ᓅᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᑳᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐊᖅᑯᑎᑯᑖᒃᑯᑦ) ᓄᓘᔮᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᖕᓂᒃ ᑐᖅᑯᐃᕕᒃ ( ) ᑭᖑᓪᓕᕐᒥᒃ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᒍᑎᒋᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᓲᖑᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ (2015, 2016) ᓄᓇᓕᖕᒥᐅᑦ ᐃᓚᐅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᕐᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᖅ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᒍᑎᒃᓴᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᖏᑦ (ᐊᒃᑐᐃᓂᖃᑲᒻᒪᔾᔭᐃᕈᑎᒃᓴᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᖏᑦ) ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᒋᔭᖏᖕᓂᒃ/ᓇᓚᐅᒃᑖᖅᓯᒪᔭᖏᖕᓂᑦ; ᑲᒪᒋᔭᖃᓚᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᐱᔾᔪᑕᐅᓪᓗᐊᖅᑐᓂᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᖁᓛᓂ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐃᓚᐅᖃᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐱᐅᓯᑎᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᓪᓗᑎᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᔭᐅᓪᓗᑎᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᒍᑎᓪᓗᐊᑕᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᖏᑦ (ᐊᓯᐊᒍᑦᐅᖃᐅᓯᕆᓗᒋᑦ, ᐅᓯᑲᑦᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᐊᒻᒪᓗᐳᐃᔩᑦᒥᒃᓵᓄᑦ) ᓄᓘᔮᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᑐᖃᖏᖕᓂᒃ ᑐᖅᑯᐃᕕᒃ ( ) ᑭᖑᓪᓕᕐᒥᒃ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᒍᑎᒋᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᓄᓇᐃᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᓲᖑᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ (2015, 2016) ᓄᓇᓕᖕᒥᐅᑦ ᐃᓚᐅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᓄᓇᓕᖕᒥᐅᑦ ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᑐᒨᖅᑎᑕᐅᔪᓐᓇᑲᓪᓚᓐᓂᖏᑦᑕ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓂᖅ ᑲᑎᒪᑎᑦᑎᓂᒃᑯᑦ (2019) ᐃᑳᕐᕕᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ ᓂᕈᐊᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔾᔪᑎᒋᔭᑦ (2019-ᐅᓪᓗᒥᒧᑦ ᓱᓕ ᑲᒪᒋᔭᖅ) ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐸᐸᑦᑎᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎ (ᐅᔭᕋᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᖃᕐᓂᓕᒫᖓᓂᒃ ᐊᑯᓂᐅᑎᒋᔪᖅ) ᓄᓇᓕᖕᒥᐅᑦ ᐃᓚᐅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ (ᐅᔭᕋᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᖃᕐᓂᓕᒫᖓᓂᒃ ᐊᑯᓂᐅᑎᒋᔪᖅ) 9 Assessment Approach Thorough and Accurate ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑏᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᖃᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᓂ ᓱᓕᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᓂᓗ Empirical-based Modelling ᑎᑎᕋᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑐᖃ ᐱᒋᐊᕐᕕᐅᔪᑦ ᐃᔾᔪᐊᕐᓗᒋᑦ Conservative model assumptions ᐅᖓᕙᐅᖅᓯᒪᖏᓪᓗᓂ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐅᑎᑦᒧᑦ ᒥᒃᓴᐅᓴᒃᑕᐅᔪᑦ Multiple, effective mitigation measures ᐊᒥᓱᓂᒃ, ᐊᔪᖏᑦᑎᐊᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᕈᑎᖃᕐᓗᓂ 10

6 Assessment Approach Thorough and Accurate ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑏᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᑦᑎᐊᒃᑲᓐᓂᖅᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ ᓱᓕᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᑎᒡᓗ 10+ years of data collected 10+ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᓄᐊᑦᑎᕕᐅᔪᖅ Over 30 regional studies ᐅᖓᑖᓂ 30 ᐊᒡᒍᖅᑐᖅᓯᒪᓂᕐᒥ ᖃᐅᔨᓵᖑᔪᑦ Peer reviews ᐱᓕᕆᖃᑎᒌᑦ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᐃᖃᑎᒌᒡᓗᑎᒃ Adaptive management approach ᐋᕿᒋᐊᕐᕕᖃᐃᓐᓇᖅᑐᒥᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᓄᑦᑑᕈᑎᖃᕐᓗᓂ 11 Study Areas ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᕕᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ Marine Environment / ᐃᒪᖅ Marine Mammals / ᐳᐃᔩᑦ 12

7 Valued Ecosystem Components ᐊᓐᓂᕆᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᕙᑎᒥᐅᑕᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᑦ Phase 2 Assessment Marine Valued Ecosystem Components ᐊᖏᓕᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᒪ ᓂᖓᓄᑦ 2 ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᖅ ᑕᕆᐅᕐᒥᐊᑕᓂᒃ ᐊᓐᓂᕆᔭᐅᔪᓂᒃ Marine Water & Sediment Quality ᑕᕆᐅᑉ ᐃᒪᖓ ᐊᒻᒪ ᐃᖅᑲᖓᑕ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖓ Marine Fish Habitat ᑕᕆᐅᒥᐅᑕᑦ ᐃᖃᓗᑦ ᓇᔪᒐᖓ Arctic Char Health ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᖏᒃᑲᓗᐊᕐᒪ ᖔᑕ Marine Birds ᑕᕆᐅᕐᒥᐅᑕᑦ ᑎᖕᒥᐊᑦ Marine Mammals ᑕᕆᐅᕐᒥᐅᑕᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᐃᑦ Sea Ice ᑐᕙᒃ 13 Phase 2 Considerations ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᒍᑎᒋᔭᐅᓂᖓᑕ ᑭᖑᓪᓕᑉ ᐃᓱᒪᒃᓴᖅᓯᐅᕈᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ Milne Port ᕿᙳᐊᓂ ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕᒃ Milne Port ᕿᙳᐊᓂ ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕᒃ Shipping ᐅᓯᑲᑦᑕᕐᓂᖅ Structure Modifications ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕᒃ ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓ Construction ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓂᖓ Wastewater and site water discharge ᐃᒋᑕᒃᓴᖅ ᐃᒪᕐᑎᐊᕙᐅᖏᑦᑐᖅ ᐊᒻᒪ ᐃᕐᖓᓂᕐᓗᑯ ᑯᕕᑎᑕᐅᕙᒃᑐᖅ ᑕᐅᕙᓂ Dust deposition, dispersion ᐳᔪᐊᕿᓗᐊᖅᑕᐃᓕᒪᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎ Habitat Loss and Alteration ᓂᕐᔪᑎᑦ ᓇᔪᒐᖏᑦ ᐊᓯᐅᔨᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓᓗ Changes in Sediment and Water Quality ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᐃᖅᑲᖓ ᐊᒻᒪ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᐱᐅᓂᖓ Increased Port Activity ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕᖕᒥ ᐱᓕᕆᓂᖅᓴᐅᓕᕐᓗᑎᒃ Wastewater and site water discharge ᐃᕐᖓᓂᕐᓗᑯ ᐃᒪᑦᑎᐊᕙᐅᖏᑦᑐᖅ ᐊᒻᒪ ᐃᒥᕐᒥᒃ ᑯᕕᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ Dust deposition, dispersion ᐳᔫᓗᐊᖅᑕᐃᓕᒪᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎ Ballast water discharge ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᐅᕚᔾᔭᐃᒃᑯᑖᑕ ᐃᒪᖓ ᑯᕕᑎᑕᐅᓂᖓ Habitat Loss and Alteration ᓇᔪᒐᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐊᓯᐅᔨᔪᑦ ᐊᒻᒪ ᓱᕋᑦᑎᕆᓂᖅ Changes in Sediment and Water Quality ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓ ᐃᖅᑲᖓ ᐊᒻᒪ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᐱᐅᓂᖓ Risk Introduction of Invasive Species ᑎᑭᕋᐃᑎᑦᑎᔪᑦ ᑕᒫᓂᕐᒥᐅᑕᐅᖏᑦᑐᓂᒃ ᐆᒪᔪᐊᕈᓯᕐᓂᒃ ᐃᓇᖐᔭᒃᑐᓂᒃ Change to Temperature and Salinity ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᑕᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᐅᖅᑰᓂᖓ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑕᕆᐅᖑᓂᖓ Ship Wake, Propeller Wash ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᐃᖏᐅᓕᒃᑎᑕᖓ, ᐸᐅᕋᐅᔭᖏᑦ ᐅᐊᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ Increased Vessel Traffic ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᑦ ᐅᓄᖅᓯᒋᐊᕐᓗᑎᒃ Icebreaking ᓯᑯᒥᒃ ᓯᕋᑦᑎᕆᓂᖅ Sediment Resuspension ᐃᖅᑲᖓᓂᑦ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᐃᓱᖅᓯᓗᓂ Habitat Erosion ᓇᔪᒐᖏᑦ ᓱᕋᑦᑎᔭᐅᓗᑎᒃ Vessel Strikes ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᑐᓗᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖏᑦ Acoustic Effects ᐃᒥᐊᑦᑐᒧᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᐃᓂᖓ Entrapment ᓯᒃᑯᔾᔭᐅᔪᑦ

8 Baffinland Approach to Mitigation ᐹᕙᓐᓛᓐᑯᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑎᖓ ᐋᖅᑭᒃᓯᒋᐊᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ Underwater noise ᑕᕆᐅᑉ ᐊᑖᓂ ᓂᐲᑦ Ballast water management ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᒧᑦ ᐅᕕᔾᔭᐃᒃᑯᑏᑦ ᐃᒥᓕᕆᔾᔪᑎᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ Impacts to Inuit culture and livelihood ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐃᓕᖅᑯᓯᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᓅᓇᓱᐊᕈᑎᒋᓲᖏᖕᓄᑦ 15 Baffinland Approach to Mitigation ᐹᕙᓐᓛᓐᑯᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑎᖓ ᐋᖅᑭᒃᓯᒋᐊᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ Includes additional measures asked for by community & regulators ᐃᓚᐅᑎᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᒃᑲᓐᓂᖁᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓂ ᒪᓕᒐᖑᖅᑎᑦᑎᔨᓂᒡᓗ Inuit at centre of adaptive management approach ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᓯᕗᓕᖅᑎᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᐋᕿᒋᐊᕐᕕᖃᐃᓐᓇᖅᑐᒥᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑎᓂᒃ 16

9 Baffinland Approach to Mitigation ᐹᕙᓐᓛᓐᑯᑦ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑎᖓ ᐋᖅᑭᒃᓯᒋᐊᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ Building on current operational experience ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᖑᑎᖃᕐᓗᓂ ᐅᓪᓗᒥᐅᔪᖅ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᓕᖅᑕᑎᓐᓂᒃ Exceeds regulatory requirements for Canadian ports ᐅᖓᑕᐅᔨᔪᑦ ᐊᑐᐊᒐᕋᓛᑦ ᒪᓕᒋᐊᖃᕐᓂᑦᑎᓐᓂᒃ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕᐅᔪᓄᑦ 17 Adaptive Management ᓱᖏᐅᑎᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᒍᑎᓂᑦ ADJUST 4. Implement Predetermined Responses as Necessary 4. ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᑦᑎᓗᑎᑦ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔭᕇᖅᑐᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᑎᒋᔭᐅᒋᐊᙵᕋᔭᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᑕᐃᒪᐃᒋᐊᖃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐋᕿᒋᐊᑲᓐᓂᕐᓗ ᒋᑦ 3. QIA Implements Inuit Stewardship Plan Monitoring Programs 3. ᕿᑭᖅᑕᓂ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᖏᑦ ᐊᑐᓕᖅᑎᑦᑎᓲᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐸᐸᑦᑎᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒥᒃ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᖏᑦ INUIT COMMITTEES ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᕋᓛᖏᑦ 1. Baffinland and QIA Agree to Adaptive Management Plan; QIA Establishes Inuit Stewardship Plan 1. ᕚᐸᓐᓛᓐ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᕿᑭᖅᑕᓂ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᖏᑦ ᐊᖏᖅᐴᒃ ᓱᖏᐅᑎᑎᒐᒃᓴᒧᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᒍᑎᒃᓴᐅᒐᔭᖅᑐᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᖏᖕᓄᑦ; ᕿᑭᖅᑕᓂ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᖏᑦ ᐋᖅᑮᓯᒪᒐᔭᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐸᐸᑦᑎᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᒥᒃ EVALUATE & LEARN ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓗᓂ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᓕᓐᓂᐊᕐᓗᓂ 2. Review of Monitoring Program Results Against Predetermined Indicators and Thresholds 2. ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓇᒃᑕᐅᓗᑎᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᑦ ᓴᖅᑮᑎᑦᑎᓯᒪᕗᑦ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔭᕇᖅᑐᓂᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᔾᔪᑎᓂᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑭᒡᓕᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᑦᑐᖃᖅᑐᕕᓂᐅᓕᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᑎᖃᕆᐊᙵᕈᑎᒋᔭᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ 18

10 Construction & Operation at Milne Port ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓂᖓ & ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖓ ᕿᙳᐊᓂ ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᒃ 19 Construction & Operation ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᐊᒻᒪ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖓ Secondary Causeway ᐱᖃᑖ ᑐᓚᒡᕕᒃ Secondary Causeway ᐱᖃᑖ ᑐᓚᒡᕕᒃ Proposed Ore Dock ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᐅᓯᓕᖅᓱᕐᕕᓕᐊᖑᔪᒪᔪᖅ Freight Dock (spud barge) ᐅᓯᖏᐊᕐᕕᒃ (ᓯᑲᐅᖅ) Existing Ore Dock ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᐅᓯᓕᖅᓱᕐᕕᒃ Freight Dock Causeway ᐅᓯᖏᐊᕐᕕᒃ ᑐᓚᒡᕕᒃ Main Causeway ᐄᒐᖓᕕᓪᓗᐊᑕᖅ New Effluent Discharge ᐃᕐᖓᓂᕐᓗᑯᓄᑦ ᑯᕕᓯᕕᒃ 20

11 Port Construction Habitat Alteration ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᒃ ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓂᖓ ᓇᔪᒐᕆᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᑎᑕᐅᔾᔪᑎᖏᑦ Phase 2 Ore Dock Design Overview ᑐᒡᓕᕆᓕᖅᑕᖓᓂᐱᓕᕆᐅᖑᔪᖅ ᓴᕕᒃᓴᓕᕆᕕᒃ ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕᖓᓄᑦᑕᑯᔭᐅᕆᐊᒍᑎ Phased approach to reduce impacts to marine environment ᑐᒡᓕᕇᓕᖓᔪᒥᒃ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑎᖃᕐᓗᓂ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᔾᔪᑏᑦ ᐅᓄᕈᓐᓃᖅᐹᓪᓕᕆᐊᕐᓗᒋᑦ ᑕᕆᐅᑉ ᐊᕙᑎᖓᓂ 21 Mitigation Port Construction ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᑲᒻᒪᓗᐊᕐᔭᐃᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᒃ ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓂᖓ Best management practices during in-water construction including: ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔪᓐᓇᑦᑎᐊᓛᓂ ᐊᑐᕐᓗᓂ ᐃᒫᓂ ᓴᓇᔪᖃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐅᑯᐊ ᐃᓚᒋᔭᐅᓗᑎᒃ: Silt curtains ᓴᓇᕕᐅᔪᖅ ᐃᒫᓂ ᐊᕙᓗᓯᒪᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᓂ Underwater noise management plan ᐃᒪᕐᒥ ᓂᐱᖃᓗᐊᕐᔭᐃᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᖏᑦ Following the guiding principles for offsetting ᒪᓕᖦᖢᒋᑦ ᑐᑭᒧᐊᕈᑏᑦ ᑐᙵᕕᖏᑦ ᐃᒪᕐᒨᖅᑲᐃᓂᐊᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᒦᙶᖅᑐᓂᑦ 22

12 Port Operation Ballast Water Impacts ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕᓕᕆᓂᖅ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᐅᕕᔾᔭᐃᑯᑎᖓᑕ ᐃᒪᖃᐅᑎᖏᓐᓂᖔᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᐃᔪᑦ 2017/2018 (TSD18) Co-developed advanced model with Danish Hydrographic Institute (DHI) Water & Environment ᓴᖅᑭᑦᑏᖃᑎᒋᓗᑎᒍᑦ ᓄᑖᖑᓛᒥᑦ ᐃᒪᓕᕆᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᒧᑦ ᑕᐃᓂᔅᑯᑦ ᐃᒪᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᖏᑕ ᐱᓕᕆᕕᖓ ᐃᒪᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᓪᓗ Calibrated to 2014 data 2014ᒥ ᐱᒋᐊᖅᖢᓂ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐅᑎᕕᓃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᔾᔪᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ 3-month simulation ᑕᖅᑭᓄᑦ ᐱᖓᓱᓄᑦ ᐆᒃᑐᕋᖅᑕᐅᓪᓗᓂ Modelled Existing and Proposed conditions ᐅᓪᓗᒥ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐅᑏᑦ ᑐᒃᓯᕋᐅᑎᒋᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᓪᓗ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᕐᒧᑦ 23 Port Operation Ballast Water Impacts ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕᓕᕆᓂᖅ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᐅᕕᔾᔭᐃᑯᑎᖓᑕ ᐃᒪᖃᐅᑎᖏᓐᓂᖔᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᐃᔪᑦ 2019 Updated Modelling 2019 ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓ ᐊᑐᒐᒃᓴᐅᑉ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓ Included 2018 Milne Inlet oceanographic and ballast water data ᐱᖃᓯᐅᔾᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ 2018-ᒥ ᑭᓐᖑᐊᑕ ᑕᕆᐅᖓᓄᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᕚᔾᔭᐃᒃᑯᑖᑕ ᐃᒪᖓᓂᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐅᑎᕕᓃᑦ Assessed potential temperature and salinity changes in ambient water ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᐃᒪᑦᑎᐊᕙᖕᓂᒃ ᐆᓇᖅᓯᕙᓪᓕᐊᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑕᕆᐅᖃᕐᓂᕐᒧᓪᓗ ᐊᓯᔾᔩᑐᐃᓐᓇᕆᐊᓖᑦ 24

13 Port Operation Ballast Water Modelling Results Effects of ballast water discharge on water quality predicted to be not significant RAIN DROP 1 milliliter or 1x10-6 m 3 BATHTUB 340 litres or 0.34 m 3 COFFEE MUG 0.2 litres or m 3 Modelled Ballast Water Over a Shipping Season: x10 11 m 3 Modelled Water Volume Milne Inlet (Ragged Island south to Milne Port): 5x10 11 m 3 Modelled Freshwater Inputs Over a Shipping Season: 0.003x10 11 m ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕᖕᒥ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᔪᑦ - ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᐅᕚᔾᔭᒃᑯᑖᑕ ᐃᒪᖓᓄᑦ ᐊᑐᒐᒃᓴᒥᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒥᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᐃᓂᖓ ᐅᕚᔾᔭᒃᑯᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑉ ᐃᒪᖅ ᑯᕕᑎᑕᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐃᒪᐅᑉ ᐱᐅᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᓇᓚᐅᑦᑖᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᖏᔫᓂᐊᖏᓐᓂᖓᓂᒃ ᒪᑯᒃ 1 milliliter ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ 1x10-6 m 3 ᐅᕕᓂᖕᓂᐊᕐᕕᒃ 340 litres ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ 0.34 m 3 ᐃᕐᖑᓯᖅ 0.2 litres ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ m 3 ᐃᔾᔪᐊᒐᒃᓴᖅ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐅᕚᔾᔭᐃᒃᑯᑎᐅᑉ ᐃᒪᖓ ᑯᕕᔭᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᓄᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓇᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ: x10 11 m 3 ᐃᔾᔪᐊᒐᒃᓴᖅ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐃᒪᖓᑕ ᐊᒃᑎᒋᓂᖓ ᕿᓐᖑᐊᓂ (Ragged Island ᕿᑭᖅᑕᖓᑕ ᓂᒋᐊᓂᑦ ᕿᓐᖑᐊᓄᑦ ᑎᑭᓪᓗᒍ): 5x10 11 m 3 ᐃᔾᔪᐊᒐᒃᓴᖅ ᐊᑐᖅᑐᖅ ᐃᒥᕐᒥᒃ ᓲᕐᓗ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᓄᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓇᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ: 0.003x10 11 m

14 Port Operation Aquatic Invasive Species Monitoring & Mitigation ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᑉ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖓ ᐃᒪᕐᒦᑦᑐᓂᑦ ᑕᒫᓂᕐᒥᐅᑕᐅᙱᑦᑐᑐᖃᕐᓂᑦ ᑕᒪᐅᙵᖅᑐᖃᓕᙱᒃᑲᓗᐊᕐᒪᖔᖅ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᖅ Most stringent in Canada & Arctic ᑲᓇᑕᒥ & ᐅᑭᐅᖅᑕᖅᑐᒥ ᒪᓕᑦᑕᐅᑦᑎᐊᓛᖑᒋᐊᓖᑦ ᐱᑐᐃᓐᓇᐅᙱᖦᖢᑎᑦ Protocol exceeds regulatory requirements (International Maritime Organization & Transport Canada) ᒪᓕᑦᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᐅᖓᑕᐅᔨᒻᒪᕆᑦᑐᑦ ᐊᑐᐊᒐᕋᓛᑦ ᒪᓕᑦᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖏᖕᓂᒃ (ᓄᓇᕐᔪᐊᕐᒥ ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᖏᑦ & ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᓕᕆᔨᕐᔪᐊᒃᑯᑦ) 27 Port Operation Aquatic Invasive Species Monitoring & Mitigation ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᑉ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖓ ᐃᒪᕐᒦᑦᑐᓂᑦ ᑕᒫᓂᕐᒥᐅᑕᐅᙱᑦᑐᑐᖃᕐᓂᑦ ᑕᒪᐅᙵᖅᑐᖃᓕᙱᒃᑲᓗᐊᕐᒪᖔᖅ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᖅ Ballast water compliance testing (salinity and temperature) by Baffinland to verify exchange ᐃᒪᕐᒨᖃᑦᑕᓗᐊᕐᔭᐃᑎᑦᑎᒍᑏᑦ ᒪᓕᑦᑕᐅᒐᓗᐊᕐᒪᖔᕐᒥᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓵᖑᓲᑦ (ᐃᒪᑉ ᑕᕆᐅᖃᓗᐊᕐᓂᖓ ᐆᓇᕐᓂᖓᓗ) ᕚᐸᓐᓛᓐ ᒃᑯᓐᓄᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᖁᓪᓗᒍ ᐃᒪᕐᒨᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᒃᑰᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᓂᖓ ᐃᒪᖅ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓗᓂ Commitment to DFO-led risk-based approach to ballast water monitoring ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᓕᕆᔨᕐᔪᐊᒃᑯᓐᓂ ᓯᕗᓕᖅᑕᐅᓗᓂ ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᓯᑐᐃᓐᓇᕆᐊᓕᖕᓂᒃ ᐱᒋᐊᕐᕕᖃᕐᓗᓂ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑎᖃᕐᓂᐊᕐᓂᖅ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᐅᕕᔾᔭᐃᒃᑯᑎᖓᑕ ᐃᒪᖃᐅᑎᖏᓐᓂᖔᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᖅ 28

15 Port Operation Aquatic Invasive Species Monitoring & Mitigation ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᑉ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖓ ᐃᒪᕐᒦᑦᑐᓂᑦ ᑕᒫᓂᕐᒥᐅᑕᐅᙱᑦᑐᑐᖃᕐᓂᑦ ᑕᒪᐅᙵᖅᑐᖃᓕᙱᒃᑲᓗᐊᕐᒪᖔᖅ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᖅ Commitment to supporting the development of a trigger list of high biological risk species or groupings of species of concern and associated response plans ᐃᑲᔪᖅᑐᐃᓂᐊᕐᓂᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᑎᑕᐅᓗᓂ ᖃᓄᐃᑦᑐᑦ ᐊᑦᑕᓇᖅᑐᒨᖅᑎᑦᑎᒍᑎᖃᕈᓐᓇᕋᔭᕐᒪᖔᕐᒥᒃ ᐆᒪᔪᑦ ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᑐᒨᖅᑎᑦᑎᒍᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᑲᑎᙵᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᐃᑦ ᐃᓱᒫᓘᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᑎᖃᕆᐊᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑕᒪᒃᑯᓄᖓ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᖃᖅᑐᑦ 29 Port Operation Impact of Dust ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖓ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐳᔪᑦ Results to-date ᖃᓄᐃᓕᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᓪᓗᒥᒧᑦ Increased stockpiling of ore at Milne Port may increase iron concentrations in the marine environment ᐊᒥᓱᕈᕆᐊᖅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᓴᕕᒃᓴᓄᒃ ᓄᐊᑦᑎᕙᓪᓕᐊᕕᒃ ᕿᙳᐊᓂ ᑐᓚᒃᑕᕐᕕᖓᓂ ᓴᕕᒃᓴᖃᕐᓕᕈᑎᑐᐃᓐᓇᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᑕᕆᐅᑉ ᐊᕙᑎᖓᓂ. Baseline monitoring indicates that iron is already abundant in the receiving environment (pre-project) ᑐᙵᕕᖏᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᔭᐅᔾᔪᑎᖏᑦᑕ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓯᒪᕗᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᖃᖅᑐᒻᒪᕆᐅᒌᕐᒪᑦ ᓄᐊᑦᑎᕕᐅᔪᒥ (ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖃᓕᖅᑎᓪᓗᑕ ᖃᐅᔨᓵᕕᓃᑦ). 30

16 Port Operation Dust Monitoring ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖓ ᐳᔪᑉ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᔭᐅᓂᖓ Since start of operations ( ), no significant increase in iron concentrations in sediment relative to baseline. ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᒋᐊᙵᔪᒐᑦᑕᓂᑦ ( ), ᐊᒥᓱᕈᕆᐊᖅᓯᒪᒻᒪᕆᙱᓚᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᑦ ᕿᒪᒃᑲᑯᓂᑦ ᑐᙵᕕᖏᑦ ᑕᑯᓐᓈᙳᐊᖅᑐᒋᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᖃᓗᐊᕐᓂᕋᓕᕐᓂᕋᕋᔭᑦᑕᑦᑕ. Metal concentrations in fish tissue have been relatively consistent between 2010 and 2019 and are aligned with expected natural variability. ᓴᕕᕋᔭᐃᑦ ᐃᖃᓘᑉ ᓂᕿᖏᖕᓂ ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖅᓯᒪᙱᓚᑦ ᑕᐃᑲᙵᓂᑦ 2010 ᑎᑭᖢᒍ 2019 ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓇᓕᒧᓐᓂᓖᑦ ᓂᕆᐅᒋᔭᐅᔪᓂᑦ ᐃᒪᕐᒦᙶᖅᑐᓂᑦ ᐊᑦᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᖃᕈᑎᒋᒐᔭᖅᑕᖏᖕᓂᑦ. Notably, iron concentrations have tended to decrease in Arctic Char in recent years compared to pre-project. ᐅᖃᐅᓯᕆᓗᐊᕐᓗᒍᓗ, ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᖃᑦᑏᓐᓇᕈᕆᐊᖅᓯᒪᕗᑦ ᐃᖃᓘᑉ ᓂᕿᖏᖕᓂ ᐊᕐᕌᒎᕋᑖᖅᑐᓂᑦ ᑕᐃᒪᙵᐅᑦᑕᔪᒻᒪᓂᑦ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖃᓚᐅᙱᑦᑎᓐᓂᑦ Shipping ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᕐᓂᖏᑦ 32

17 Shipping Activity Overview Route ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᕐᓂᖏᑕ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖓ - ᐊᖅᑯᑎᐊ Modified based on input from Pond Inlet ᐋᖅᑭᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᒪᓕᖦᖢᒋᑦ ᑐᓴᖅᑐᕕᓂᐅᓂᕗᑦ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᒃᓴᕆᔭᕕᓂᕐᓂᒃ ᒥᑦᑎᒪᑕᓕᖕᒥ Route & speed restrictions monitored by Baffinland using satellite technology ᐊᖅᑯᑎᖏᑦ & ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔮᓗᐊᖅᑕᐃᓕᒪᕝᕕᖏᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᔭᐅᓲᑦ ᐹᕙᓐᓛᓐᑯᓐᓂ ᐊᑐᖅᖢᑎᑦ ᖁᒻᒧᐊᑦᑎᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑎᒎᖅᑐᓂᒃ 33 Shipping Activity Overview Route ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᕐᓂᖏᑕ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖓ - ᐊᖅᑯᑎᐊ Established set-back area 40km from Nunavut Settlement Area at start of shipping season ᐋᖅᑭᒃᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦᐅᑎᕆᐊᕐᕕᐅᔪᓐᓇᕐᓂᖓ40km ᑕᐃᑲᙵᑦ ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᓄᓇᑖᕈᑕᐅᓯᒪᕝᕕᖓᓂᐱᒋᐊᕋᐃᖕᒪᑦᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓇᖅ Notifications triggered when vessels: ᑐᓴᖅᑎᑕᐅᓲᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ: Deviate off route ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᕆᓂᐊᖅᑕᖏᑎᒎᕈᓐᓃᕋᐃᒻᒪᑕ Speeds exceed voluntary 9 knots ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᖏᑕ ᓱᑲᓐᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᖓᑕᐅᔨᑎᑦᑎᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ 9 ᓱᑲᓐᓂᖏᑦ 34

18 Shipping Activity Overview Selection of Shipping Season ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᓂᖏᑕ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖓ - ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᓄᑦ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᕐᓇᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ Phase II Shipping / ᐊᖏᒡᓕᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᓂᖓ 2 ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᒃᑯᑦ Icebreaking Support Jul 1 Aug 5 Oct 15 Nov 15 ᓯᑯᓯᐅᑎᓂᒃ ᐃᑲᔪᖅᑐᖅ ᔪᓚᐃ 1-ᒥᑦ ᐋᒍᓯ 5-ᒧᑦ ᐅᒃᑑᐸ 15-ᒥᑦ ᓄᕕᐱᕆ 15-ᒧᑦ Open Water Season ᓯᑯᖃᓐᖏᑎᓪᓗᒍ Upirngaaq Aujaq Ukiaksaaq Ukiuq ᐅᐱᕐᖔᖅ ᐊᐅᔭᖅ ᐅᑭᐊᒃᓵᖅ ᐅᑭᐅᖅ JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Average ice break-up (Jul 18) ᓯᑯᐃᔭᓕᖅᐸᒃᑐᖅ (ᔪᓚᐃ 18) Average ice formation (Nov 11) ᓯᑯᓕᖅᐸᒃᑐᖅ (ᓄᕕᐱᕆ11) 35 Shipping Activity Overview Start of Shipping Season ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ ᐱᒋᐊᕐᓂᖓ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕆᐊᕐᓂᑉ Baffinland Pre-shipping Season Planning ᐹᕙᓐᓛᓐᑯᑦ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓇᐅᓂᐊᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐸᕐᓇᖕᓂᖏᑦ Vessels to remain in Baffin Bay ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᑐᖅᓱᑲᑦᑕᕐᒥ Baffinland Call/ /in-person visit to MHTO Manager: Are hunters still using floe edge? ᐹᕙᓐᓛᓐᑯᑦ ᐅᖄᓚᓂᖏᑦ/ᖃᕋᓴᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᕐᓂᖏᑦ/ᐃᓄᒃᑎᐳᑦ ᐱᓛᕆᐊᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᒥᑦᑎᒪᑕᓕᖕᒥ ᐆᒪᔪᕐᓂᐊᖅᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᖓᓄᑦ: ᐊᖑᓇᓱᒃᑏᑦ ᓱᓕ ᓯᓈᓅᖃᑦᑕᖅᐸᑦ ᓱᓕ? Yes ᐄ No ᐋᒃᑲ MHTO Manager confirms to Baffinland Yes hunter status via /in-person/phone ᐆᒪᔪᕐᓂᐊᖅᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᖓ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᔪᕕᓂᐅᕗᖅ ᕚᐸᓐᓛᓐ ᒃᑯᓐᓄᑦ ᐄ ᒎᖅ ᐊᖑᓇᓱᒃᑏᑦ ᐊᑐᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖏᖕᓂᑦ ᖃᕋᓴᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᖢᓂ/ᐃᓄᒃᑎᒍᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᖃᑎᖃᖅᖢᑎᑦ/ᐅᖄᓚᐅᑎᒃᑯᑎᒍᑦ ᐅᖃᕐᕕᖃᖅᖢᑎᑦ MHTO Manager confirms to Baffinland No hunter status via ᐆᒪᔪᕐᓂᐊᖅᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᖓ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᔪᕕᓂᐅᕗᖅ ᕚᐸᓐᓛᓐ ᒃᑯᓐᓄᑦ ᐋᒃᑲ ᒎᖅ ᐊᖑᓇᓱᒃᑏᑦ ᐊᑐᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖏᖕᓂᑦ ᖃᕋᓴᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᖢᓂ Baffinland notifies shipping operator of hunter status ᐸᕙᓐᓛᓐ ᒃᑯᑦ ᑐᓴᖅᑎᑦᑎᓲᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᑦᑕᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒥᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔨᒥᒃ ᐊᖑᓇᓱᒃᑏᑦ ᓱᑯᑦᑎᐊᓃᓲᖑᖕᒪᖔᑕ Baffinland Letter to MHTO notifying official start of shipping season ᐹᕙᓐᓛᓐᑯᑦ ᑎᑎᖅᑲᖓ ᒥᑦᑎᒪᑕᓕᖕᒥ ᐆᒪᔪᕐᓂᐊᖅᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᑐᓴᖅᑎᑦᑎᓪᓗᑎᑦ ᐱᒋᐊᕐᕕᒋᓂᐊᖅᑖᑕ ᐅᓯᑲᑦᑕᕐᓇᑉ Vessels may enter Eclipse Sound and proceed to Milne Port ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐃᓯᕈᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᑕᓯᐅᔭᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑲᔪᓯᓗᑎᑦ ᕿᙳᐊᓂ ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᖕᒧᑦ 36

19 Shipping Activity Overview Transit Restrictions ᐅᓯᑲᑦᑕᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕈᑎᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᔭᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ ᓱᑯᑦᑎᐊᒎᕆᐊᖃᙱᕝᕕᖏᑦᑕ Vessel Management in Heavier Ice Conditions / ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᓯᑯᖃᓗᐊᖅᑐᑎᒎᕐᓂᐊᕐᓗᑎᑦ Ice Concentration / ᓯᑯᖃᕐᓂᖓ Ice Concentration / ᓯᑯᖃᕐᓂᖓ Ice Concentration / ᓯᑯᖃᕐᓂᖓ 1 transit per 24 hour period 1 ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓗᑎᑦᐊᑕᐅᓯᐊᖅ ᐅᑯᐊᐊᓂᒍᕋᐃᒍᑎᑦ 24 ᐃᑲᕐᕋᑦ 37 1 transit per 24 hour period 2 ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓗᑎᑦᐊᑕᐅᓯᐊᖅ ᐅᑯᐊᐊᓂᒍᕋᐃᒍᑎᑦ 24 ᐃᑲᕐᕋᓂᑦ 3/10 ᑐᖔᓂᓘᓐᓃᑦ Regular operations ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖃᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᓂᖏᑦ 9 tenths Very closepack 9 ᖁᓕᐅᔪᓂᑦ ᑲᑎᙵᐅᓗᐊᖅᑐᑦ 4-6 tenths Open drift 4-6 ᖁᓕᐅᔪᓂᑦ ᒪᑐᐃᖓᔪᖅ 1-3 tenths 1-3 ᖁᓕᐅᔪᓂᑦ Very open drift ᒪᑐᐃᖓᓗᓂᑲᒪᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ 37 Shipping Activity Overview - # of Vessels ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᖅᑐᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖓ - ᐅᓄᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ Vessel (Phase 2) ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᖅ (ᐊᖏᓕᒋᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᒪᓂᖓ 2-ᒥ) Ore Carriers ᓴᕕᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᖅᑏᑦ Other Project Vessels ᐊᓯᖏᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ Total ᑲᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ Daily Avg/Mth ᖃᐅᑕᒫᓐ/ᑕᖅᑭᑕᒫᓐ ᐊᑯᓂᐅᓂᖓ July/ᔪᓚᐃ August/ᐋᒡᒌᓯ September / ᓯᑎᐱᕆ October / ᐆᑦᑑᐱᕆ Total / ᑲᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ

20 Shipping Activity Overview Vessel Size ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐊᖏᓕᕇᑦ Panamax Post- Panamax Capesize 39 Similar size to Crystal Serenity cruise ship / ᐊᒃᑎᒋᓂᖓ ᐊᔾᔨᖃᖅᑐᖅ Crystal Serenty ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᖓᑐᑦ 39 Shipping Activity Overview Vessel Speeds ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᖅᑐᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᓂᖓᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᐊ - ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᓱᒃᑲᓂᖏᑦ 9 knot restriction for all Project vessels in regional study area 9 knot-ᓂᒃ ᓱᒃᑲᐃᓐᓂᖃᕆᐊᖃᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᓘᓐᓇᖏᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᔪᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᑕᐃᕙᓂ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᕕᐅᔪᒥ Vessel Type / ᐅᒥᐊᔪᐊᑉ ᖃᓄᐃᑦᑑᓂᖓ Project Ore Carriers ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᔭᕋᒃᓴᒥᒃ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᖅᑎᐅᔪᑦ Project Icebreaker ᓯᑯᓯᐅᖅᑎᑦ Cruise Ships ᐳᓚᕋᑎᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ Coast Guard Icebreakers ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᓂᒃ ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᖅᑎᑦ ᓯᑯᓯᐅᖅᑎᑦ % time under 9 knots (2019 data) / % ᐊᑯᓂᐅᓂᖓ ᑐᖔᓂ 9 knots (2019 ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᑦ) Nuliajuk 40

21 What makes Ragged Island a good anchorage location? ᐃᒥᓕᖕᓂ ᓱᒻᒪᑦ ᑭᓴᖅᓯᒪᓗᓂ ᐱᐅᓇᔭᖅᐸ? Is within reasonable close proximity to Milne Port ᖃᓂᑦᑐᑯᓘᒐᒥ ᕿᙳᐊᓂ ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᒻᒧᑦ Depth is less than 100 m ᐃᑎᓂᖓ ᑐᖔᓃᑦᑐᖅ 100 ᒦᑕᔅ Width allows for safe maneuverability ᓴᓂᒧᑦ ᑕᑭᓂᖓ ᐊᑦᑕᓇᙱᑦᑐᒥᒃ ᓴᖑᕕᒃᓴᐅᕗᖅ Provides refuge during weather events ᓯᓚᑲᒻᒪᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐅᖅᑯᐊᓐᓂᐅᓪᓗᓂ Allows for 3 vessels to be safely anchored at the same time ᐱᖓᓱᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᑭᓴᖅᓯᒪᖃᑎᒌᒍᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ Closest location to Milne (important particularly with ice mitigation measures in shoulder season) ᖃᓂᓛᖅ ᕿᙳᐊᓄᑦ (ᐱᒻᒪᕆᐅᔪᖅ ᓯᑯᖃᓗᐊᓕᕈᓂ ᐅᒥᐊᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᖃᑦᑕᙱᑦᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᒥ) Is not considered to be of heightened ecological importance (unlike Koluktoo Bay and Tremblay Sound) ᐃᓱᒪᒋᔭᐅᙱᓚᖅ ᐆᒪᔪᑦ ᓇᔪᒐᖏᓐᓂᓪᓗ ᐊᑦᑐᖅᑕᐅᓗᐊᕐᓂᐊᕐᓂᖏᖕᓂᑦ (ᓲᕐᓗᒃ ᑕᐃᒪᐃᑦᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᖁᕐᓗᖅᑑᖅ ᐃᒪᖓ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑲᖏᖅᖢᐊᕐᔪᑉ ᐃᒪᖓᓂ) Masters must be convinced of safe location prior to anchoring ᐊᖁᑏᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᑖᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᐊᑦᑕᓇᙱᑦᑑᓂᖓᓂᒃ ᑭᓴᓚᐅᖅᑎᓐᓇᒋᑦ 41 Potential Acoustic Effects on Marine Mammals ᓂᐱᖃᓗᐊᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᔾᔪᑎᖃᕈᓐᓇᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᑕᕆᐅᕐᒥ ᓂᕐᔪᑏᑦ Acoustic Injury ᓂᐱᖅᑯᖅᓱᔪᓄᑦ ᐃᓕᙵᒃᓯᒪᔪᑦ Behavioural Disturbance ᐱᐅᓯᕆᔭᖓᓂᒃ ᐸᒡᕕᓴᐃᔪᖅ Masking ᑐᓴᖅᓴᐅᓗᐊᖅᑕᐃᓕᒪᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎ 42

22 Shipping No Acoustic Injury ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ - ᐃᒥᐊᓐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐃᓕᓐᖓᒃᑎᕆᖏᑦᑐᑦ No potential for acoustic injury (temporary or permanent), based on both modelling and field data ᐃᒥᐊᓐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐃᓕᓐᖓᒃᑎᕆᖏᑦᑐᑦ (ᐃᓕᓐᖓᒃᑎᕆᑲᐃᓐᓇᖅᑐᖅ ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᐃᓕᓐᖓᒃᓯᒪᐃᓐᓇᕐᓂᐊᓕᕐᓗᓂ ᐃᓕᓐᖓᒃᑎᕆᔪᖅ), ᑐᓐᖓᕕᒋᔭᐅᔪᑦ ᑕᒪᕐᒥᒃ ᐃᔾᔪᐊᒐᒃᓴᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓚᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᒻᒪ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓪᓗᑎᒃ ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᓄᐊᒃᑎᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ Mitigation measures effectively reduce spatial and temporal overlap with vessel noise ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᓗᐊᖅᑕᐃᓕᒪᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖏᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᓪᓗᑎᒃ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᓂᐹᕿᔭᖏᓐᓂᖅᓴᐅᔪᑦ ᐸᔾᔭᓗᐃᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᖑᖃᑎᖏᓐᓂᒃ 43 Shipping Behavioural Disturbance ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ - ᓂᕐᔪᑎᑦ ᐃᓕᖅᑯᓯᕆᔭᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐸᒡᕕᓴᐃᓂᖅ Multiple lines of evidence indicate narwhals will be disturbed by vessel-based sound ᐅᓄᖅᑐᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᔾᔪᑎᐅᔪᑦ ᐊᑐᕐᓗᒋᑦ ᕿᓚᓗᒐᑦ ᐊᓪᓚᓐᖑᐊᑦ ᐸᒡᕕᓴᒃᑕᐅᒐᔭᕐᒪᑕ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᓂᐱᖓᓄᑦ Response is short-term and localised ᓯᕕᑭᑦᑐᒧᑦ ᐊᒃᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᕆᔭᖏᑦ, ᑕᕝᕙᓂᑦᑕᐃᓐᓈᖅᑐᑦ Underwater Noise Assessment: Mary River Iron Mine Created Feb 2019 by Melanie Austin 44 ᐃᒪᕐᒥ ᓂᐲᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ: ᓄᓘᔮᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᒥᒃ ᐅᔭᕋᓐᓂᐊᕐᓂᖅ ᐋᖅᑭᓱᖅᑕᕕᓂᖅ ᕖᕝᕗᐊᕆ 2019-ᖑᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᒥᐊᓚᓂ ᐋᔅᑎᓐᒧᑦ

23 Shipping Behavioural Disturbance ᐅᓯᑲᑦᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᐃᓕᖅᑯᓯᕆᔭᐅᔪᓂᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᕐᓂᑦ ᐸᕝᕕᓴᒍᓐᓇᕐᓂᖏᑦ Animation of tagged narwhal in relation to active shipping during open water season ᓅᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᓂᕕᖓᑖᓕᖅᓱᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᖃᕐᓇᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ Shipping Behavioural Disturbance ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ - ᓂᕐᔪᑎᑦ ᐃᓕᖅᑯᓯᕆᔭᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐸᒡᕕᓴᐃᓂᖅ Mitigation measures will reduce source levels (such as speed restrictions) and overlap (such as limiting # of transits in heavy ice) ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᓗᐊᖅᑕᐃᓕᒪᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᐃᑦ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᐸᒡᕕᓴᐃᖏᓐᓂᖅᓴᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᑦ (ᓲᕐᓗ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᓱᒃᑲᐃᑕᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖏᑦ) ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐸᔾᔭᕐᓗᒃᓯᒪᔪᑦ (ᓲᕐᓗ ᑭᒡᓕᓕᐅᕆᓂᖅ ᐅᓄᕐᓂᕆᔭᖏᓐᓂᒃ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᔪᑦ ᓯᑯᖃᕐᔪᐊᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ) Residual effect characterised as not significant ᕿᒪᒃᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᓱᕈᕐᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᐱᑕᖃᓗᐊᖏᑦᑐᑦ Underwater Noise Assessment: Mary River Iron Mine Created Feb 2019 by Melanie Austin 46 ᐃᒪᕐᒥ ᓂᐲᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ: ᓄᓘᔮᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᒥᒃ ᐅᔭᕋᓐᓂᐊᕐᓂᖅ ᐋᖅᑭᓱᖅᑕᕕᓂᖅ ᕖᕝᕗᐊᕆ 2019-ᖑᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᒥᐊᓚᓂ ᐋᔅᑎᓐᒧᑦ

24 Shipping Temporary Acoustic Masking ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᓂᐱᖃᖅᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᑐᓵᔭᐅᔪᒪᙱᑦᑐᒥᒃ ᖄᖅᑯᑦᑎᑲᐃᓐᓇᖁᓪᓗᒋᑦ Narwhal generally communicate at higher frequencies than vessel noise and may use natural anti-masking strategies ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᖁᑦᑎᓂᖅᓴᒥᒃ ᓂᐱᐅᔪᒥᒃ ᑐᓴᐅᒪᖃᑎᒌᓲᖑᖕᒪᑕ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᕙᓗᒃ ᐊᑦᑎᓂᖅᓴᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᓂᐱᖓ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᑐᕈᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᓂᐱᖃᖅᑎᑦᑎᓗᑎᑦ ᑐᓵᔭᐅᔪᒪᙱᑦᑐᒥᒃ ᖄᖅᑯᑦᑎᖃᑦᑕᖅᖢᑎᑦ Mitigation measures effectively reduce spatial and temporal overlap with vessel noise ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᓗᐊᕐᔭᐃᑎᑦᑎᒍᑏᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᖃᑦᑎᐊᑐᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᕙᑎᖓᓂ ᖄᖅᑯᑦᑎᒍᓐᓇᓲᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᕙᓗᒃᑐᓂᑦ 47 Shipping No Ice Entrapment Caused By Shipping ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᓯᒃᑯᔾᔪᔾᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᖃᖏᑦᑐᖅ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᓕᕆᓂᕐᒥᒃ Ice entrapment naturally occurring phenomenon, documented in Arctic for hundreds of years / 48 ᓯᒃᑯᔾᔭᐅᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᑦ ᕿᓚᓗᒐᐃᑦ ᑕᐃᒪᐃᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᑦ ᐃᓕᖅᑯᓯᖓᓂᒃ ᐊᑐᖅᑐᑦ, ᑎᑎᕋᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐅᑭᐅᖅᑕᖅᑐᕐᒥ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐅᓄᖅᑐᒻᒪᕆᐊᓗᖕᓄᑦ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᒋᓄᑦ ᕼᐊᓇᓚᖏᓐᓃᑦᑐᓄᑦ ᑕᐃᒪᐃᖃᑦᑕᖅᓯᒪᓂᕋᐃᔪᑦ Baffinland has committed to a post-season narwhal clearance survey and development of entrapment response framework with MHTO and DFO / ᐹᕙᓐᓛᓐᑯᑦ ᐊᖏᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᔪᒪᓂᖃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᕈᓐᓃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᕿᓚᓗᒐᑦ ᕿᒪᐃᓯᒪᔪᐃᓐᓇᐅᓕᕐᒪᖔᑕ ᓈᓴᐃᓗᑎᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓗᑎᒃ 48

25 Shipping No Vessel Strikes ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ - ᐆᒪᔪᓂᒃ ᑐᓗᖃᑦᑕᐅᔪᖃᓚᐅᖅᓯᒪᖏᑦᑐᖅ With mitigation, no strikes anticipated ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᓗᐊᖅᑕᐃᒪᑎᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ, ᑐᓗᖅᓯᓂᐊᕆᐊᖏᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᓂᒃ ᓂᕆᐅᖏᑦᑐᑦᖅ 13 knots considered speed threshold above which mortality is likely (based on literature) 13 knots-ᓂᒃ ᓱᒃᑲᓂᖃᕐᓂᖅ ᑭᒡᓕᓕᐊᕆᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᖅ ᑐᖔᓃᑦᑐᖅ ᑐᖁᕋᐃᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑦ ᑭᒡᓕᖓᑕ (ᒪᓕᒡᓗᒋᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᓯᒪᔪᖁᑎᒋᔭᑦ) 10 knot restrictions for endangered species based on DFO Annual Guidance to Mariners 10 knots-ᓂᒃ ᒪᓕᒐᖃᖅᑐᑦ ᓱᒃᑲᓂᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᓄᖑᓐᓂᐊᖅᑐᒋᔭᐅᓕᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐱᑕᖃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ North Atlantic right whale (Gulf of St. Lawrence-ᑰᖓᓂ 9 knot speed restriction in regional study area is more conservative, goes above and beyond existing precedent, and notably minimizes strike potential 9 knots ᓱᒃᑲᓂᕆᔭᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᖅᑐᑉ ᒪᓕᒐᖓ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᕕᐅᔪᒥ ᐱᐅᖅᓱᐊᖅᑐᒻᒪᕆᐅᕗᖅ, ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᐅᓂᖅᓴᐅᓪᓗᓂ ᐅᖓᑖᓄᐊᖅᓯᒪᓪᓗᓂᓗ ᒫᓐᓇ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ, ᐊᒻᒪ ᑐᓗᖃᑦᑕᐅᑎᒐᔭᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐱᑕᖃᖏᓐᓂᖅᓴᐅᑎᑦᑎᔪᖅ Compliance is diligently and transparently monitored a notification system is in place that alerts Baffinland staff if a vessel exceeds the 9 knot speed limit for fast corrective action or investigation. ᒪᓕᒃᑕᐅᒐᓗᐊᕐᒪᖔᑕ ᒪᓕᒐᐃᑦ ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᐃᑦᑎᐊᕐᓗᑎᒃ - ᑐᓴᖅᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᓂᖓ ᐱᑕᖃᕐᓗᓂ ᖃᐅᔨᒃᑲᖅᑕᐅᖁᓪᓗᖏᑦ ᐹᕙᓐᓛᓐ ᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᖅᑎᖏᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᖅ 9 knots ᐅᖓᑖᓄᑦ ᓱᒃᑲᓂᖃᓕᕐᓂᖅᐸᑦ 49 Marine Monitoring ᑕᕆᐅᕐᒥᐅᑕᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ Objectives: Measure the effects that the shipping is having on the marine environment Assess the accuracy of predictions of effects Determines if adaptive mitigation measures need to be developed Aerial Survey Monitor narwhal abundance and distribution (Eclipse Sound summer herd) and other marine mammal species in Project area Bruce Head Shore-based Monitoring Investigate narwhal response to shipping along the Northern Shipping Route by observing them from top of Bruce Head Marine Environmental Effects and Aquatic Invasive Species/Habitat Offset Ballast water and video monitoring of vessel hulls Water quality, sediment, metals Fish abundance and health Ongoing monitoring for the construction of ore and freight docks Ship-based Observer Observe for potential ship strikes Inform vessel Master if marine mammals are trapped or disturbed Acoustic Monitoring Confirm accuracy of noise modelling Inuit Stewardship Plan

26 Marine Monitoring ᑕᕆᐅᕐᒥᐅᑕᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐱᓇᓱᐊᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ: ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓗᑎᑦ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᐅᔪᑦ ᐃᒪᕐᒥ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓗᑎᑦ ᓇᓚᐅᒃᑖᖅᑕᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐱᑦᑎᐊᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᕋᔭᕐᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓲᑦ ᓱᖏᐅᑎᑎᑦᑎᒋᐊᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᑲᒻᒪᑦᑕᐃᓕᒪᔾᔪᓂᑎ ᑦ ᐋᖅᑮᔪᖃᕆᐊᖃᕋᔭᕐᒪᖔᖅ ᖃᖓᑕᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᖅ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᔭᐅᓗᑎᑦ ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᐊᒥᓲᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓱᑯᑦᑎᐊᓃᓐᓂᕆᓲ ᖏᑦ (ᑕᓯᐅᔭᕐᒥ ᐊᐅᔭᒃᑯᑦ ᑕᒫᓃᓲᑦ) ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᓯᖏᑦ ᐳᐃᔩᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖃᕐᕕᒻᒥ ᐃᓗᕕᓕᑉ ᓯᔾᔭᖓᓂ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓗᑎᑦ ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᓲᖑᓂ ᖏᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᐅᔪᓄ ᑦ ᐅᐊᖕᓇᖓᓂ ᐊᖅᑯᑎᖓᒍᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᖅᑐᑦ ᑕᐅᑐᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᖁᓛᓂ ᐃᓗᕕᓕᑉ ᐃᒪᕐᒥ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᒦᖦᖢᑎᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑐᑦ ᐆᒪᔪᐃᑦ ᑕᐅᑐᑦᑐᑦ ᑕᒫᓂᕐᒥᐅᑕᐅᙱᑦᑐᑦ/ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᓇᔪᒐᕆᔭᓂᑦ ᐊᖅᓵᖅᓯᔪᑦ ᐊᐳᖅᓯᓂᖏᖕᓂ ᐃᒪᕐᒨᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᒥ ᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᑕᕐᕆᔮᒃᓴᑎᒍᑦ ᑐᓴᖅᑎᑕᐅᓗᓂ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᔭᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᕐᒥ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐊᖁᑎ ᐳᐃᔩᑦ ᐃᒪᑉ ᐱᐅᓂᖓ, ᕿᒪᒃᑲᑯᑦ ᓇᒧᙵᕈᓐᓇᐃᓪ ᒪᕐᕋᑦᓯᐅᕋᓪᓗ, ᓴᕕᕋᔭᑦ ᓕᑎᑕᐅᒐᒻᒪᑕ ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦ ᐊᒥᓲᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐱᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐋᓐᓂᐊᖅᑕᐃᓕᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᔭᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐸᕝᕕᓴᑦᑕᐅᒍᑎᑦ ᓴᓇᔭᐅᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᖅᑕᐅᔪᓄᑦ ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᖏᑦ ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᖓ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓗ ᓂ ᐱᑦᑎᐊᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏ ᑦ ᓂᐱᖃᓗᐊᕐᔭᐃᕈ ᑏᑦ ᐋᖅᑭᓱᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐸᐸᑦᑎᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎ Monitoring: Inuit Involvement ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᐊᖃᕐᓂᖅ: ᐃᓄᖕᓂᒃ ᐃᓚᐅᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ A total of 18 Inuit (some worked on multiple programs) in 2019 vs 14 non-inuit personnel ᑲᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ 18-ᖑᔪᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ (ᐃᓚᖏᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᖃᑕᐅᖃᑦᑕᖅᓯᒪᓂᑰᔪᑦ ᐅᓄᖅᑐᓂᒃ ᐊᔾᔨᒌᖏᑦᑐᓂᒃ ) 2019-ᖑᑎᓪᓗᒍ 14-ᖑᓚᐅᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᖅᑲᓇᐃᔭᖅᑎᑦ ᖃᓪᓗᓈᑦ Lead Inuit Researchers identified on monitoring programs ᓯᕗᓕᖅᑎᐅᔪᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑎᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᓯᓚᐅᖅᑐᑦ ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᐊᖃᕐᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᒃᓴᓂᒃ Program-specific follow-up meetings in Pond Inlet with all Inuit researchers ᐱᓕᕆᐊᒃᓴᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒋᐊᒃᑲᓐᓂᕈᑎᒃᓴᐅᔪᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᓂᐅᓚᐅᖅᑐᓄᑦ ᒥᑦᑎᒪᑕᓕᖕᒥ ᐊᒻᒪ ᑲᑎᒪᖃᑎᒋᔭᐅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐃᓘᓐᓇᖏᑦ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑎᐅᔪᑦ 52

27 Monitoring: Inuit Involvement ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᐊᖃᕐᓂᖅ: ᐃᓄᖕᓂᒃ ᐃᓚᐅᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ Meetings with MHTO to discuss monitoring programs ᒥᑦᑎᒪᑕᓕᖕᒥ ᐆᒪᔪᕐᓂᐊᖅᑎᒃᑯᖏᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑐᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᖃᑎᒋᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ Inuit monitors involved in data analysis and reporting ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᖅᑎᐅᔪᑦ ᐃᓚᐅᖃᑦᑕᖅᑐᑦ ᑐᓴᒃᓴᓂᒃ ᓄᐊᑦᑎᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐅᓂᒃᑳᖃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ Pond Inlet Shipping Monitors (Active Watch of Project Vessels) ᓄᑖᑦ ᓯᒡᔭᒥ ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᐃᕕᐅᔪᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᓂ ᐃᓕᔭᐅᓯᒪᓕᖅᑐᑦ ᒥᑦᑎᒪᑕᓕᖕᒥ (ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᕈᑕᐅᓪᓗᑎᒃ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᓂᒃ ᐊᖅᑯᓵᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᔪᓂᒃ) 53 Marine Mammal Aerial Survey Program Annual Comparisons ᐳᐃᔩᑦ ᖁᓛᒎᓕᑎᒍᑦ ᖃᖓᑕᓲᒃᑯᓘᓐᓂᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖅ ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᓐᓂᖏᖕᓂ ᖃᐅᔨᓵᑦ Year / ᐊᕐᕌᒍ Date / ᐅᓪᓗᖅ Abundance / ᐊᒥᓲᓂᖏᑦ CV 95% CI Source / ᑐᑭᓯᒋᐊᕈᑏᑦ ᐱᔭᐅᓂᖏᑦ Eclipse Sound ᑕᓯᐅᔭᖅ 2004 August / ᐋᒡᒌᓯ 20, ,471 37,096 Richard et al / ᕆᑦᓱᑦ ᐊᓯᖏᓪᓗ Eclipse Sound ᑕᓯᐅᔭᖅ Eclipse Sound ᑕᓯᐅᔭᖅ Eclipse Sound ᑕᓯᐅᔭᖅ Eclipse Sound ᑕᓯᐅᔭᖅ Eclipse Sound ᑕᓯᐅᔭᖅ August / ᐋᒡᒌᓯ 10, ,342 17, August / ᐋᒡᒌᓯ 12, ,768 18, August / ᐋᒡᒌᓯ 20, , , August / ᐋᒡᒌᓯ 12, ,245 23, , August / ᐋᒡᒌᓯ 9, ,009 10,946 Doniol-Valcroze et al / ᑐᓂᐅᓪ ᕙᓪᑯᕉᔾ ᐊᓯᖏᓪᓗ Marcoux et al / ᒪᑰ ᐊᓯᖏᓪᓗ Golder 2018 (DFO data) / ᒎᓪᑐᕐ 2018 (ᐃᖃᓗᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᑭᒡᓕᓯᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ) Golder 2018 (DFO data) / ᒎᓪᑐᕐ 2018 (ᐃᖃᓗᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ ᑭᒡᓕᓯᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ) Golder 2020 (Baffinland data) / ᒎᓪᑐᕐ 2020 (ᕚᐸᓐᓛᓐ ᒃᑯᓐᓂ ᑭᒡᓕᓯᓂᐊᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ)

28 Recorded Harvest Data ᓂᐱᓕᐊᖑᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐊᖑᔭᒥᓃᑦ ᑐᑭᓯᒋᐊᕈᑎᖏᑦ No. of Harvest ᐊᒥᓲᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᖑᔭᑦ Pond Inlet - Total Allowable Harvest ᒥᑦᑎᒪᑕᓕᖕᒥ - ᑲᑎᓕᒫᖅᖢᒋᑦ ᐊᒥᓱᓂᖏᑦ ᐊᖑᔭᐅᔪᓐᓇᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᓂᕐᔪᑏᑦ Humane Harvest (624 Animals Trapped in Ice) ᑐᖁᑐᐃᓐᓇᖁᓇᒋᑦ ᐊᖑᔭᑦ (624 ᐆᒪᔪᑦ ᓯᒃᑯᖅᑲᐅᖅᑲᔪᑦ) Humane Harvest (231 Animals Trapped in Ice) ᑐᖁᑐᐃᓐᓇᖁᓇᒋᑦ ᐊᖑᔭᑦ (231 ᐆᒪᔪᑦ ᓯᒃᑯᖅᑲᐅᖅᑲᔪᑦ) *Data provided from DFO *Data for 2018 is based off preliminary estimates from MHTO *ᑐᑭᓯᒋᐊᕈᑏᑦ ᑐᓂᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ ᐃᖃᓗᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᓂᓪᓗ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ *ᑐᑭᓯᒋᐊᕈᑏᑦ 2018 ᒧᑦ ᑐᙵᕕᓖᑦ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᓇᓚᐅᒃᑖᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᔪᕕᓃᑦ ᒥᑦᑎᒪᑕᓕᖕᒥ ᐆᒪᔪᕐᓂᐊᖅᑎᒃᑯᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᖏᖕᓂ 55 Narwhal Early Warning Indicator Monitoring ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᔭᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᑐᒨᕐᓂᐊᕋᓱᒋᔭᐅᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᒃᑯᑕᖏᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᔭᐅᔾᔪᑎᖏᑦ Requirement to Identify Marine Mammal EWIs in other Marine Development Projects in Canada ᒪᓕᑦᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᖁᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐳᐃᔩᑦ EWI ᐊᓯᖏᖕᓂ ᒪᕆᓐ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᔪᓕᕆᔨᐅᔪᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᓂᑦ ᑲᓇᑕᒥ Requirement / ᒪᓕᑦᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ Early Warning Indicators ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᑐᒨᕈᓐᓇᐅᑏᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᕈᑎᖏᑦ Year / ᐊᕐᕌᒍ Mary River / ᓄᓘᔮᑦ Northern Gateway / ᐅᐊᖕᓇᖓᒎᕐᕕᒃᓴᖅ LNG Canada / LNG ᑲᓇᑕ Trans-Mountain / ᑲᓇᑕᓕᒫᕐᒥ ᖃᖅᑲᖏᑦ Roberts Bank Terminal 2 / ᕌᕗᑦᔅ ᕚᓐᒃ ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᖓ 2 Agnico Eagle / ᐊᒡᓃᑰ ᐄᒍᓪ Meliadine Agnico Eagle / ᐊᒡᓃᑰ ᐄᒍᓪ Amuraq Whale Tail X X X X X X Annual Proportion of Immature Narwhal Recorded during the Bruce Head-Shore-based Monitoring Program ᐊᕐᕌᒍᑕᒫᑦ ᐊᒥᓲᓂᖏᑦ ᐱᕈᕇᖅᓯᒪᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᑕᒥᓃᑦ ᐃᓗᕕᓕᒻᒥ ᓯᔾᔭᒦᖦᖢᑎᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖓᒍᑦ Proportion of Immature Narwhal / ᐱᕈᕇᖅᓯᒪᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᑑᒑᓖᑦ N/A / ᑐᕌᖓᙱᑦᑐᖅ Pilot vessel-based monitoring program replaced the Bruce Head shore-based monitoring program in The pilot program was not successful in yielding a comparable dataset for inclusion in this analysis ᖑᑎᓪᓗᒍ, 1ᐆᑦᑐᕋᐅᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᒦᖦᖢᑎᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖅ ᐃᓇᖐᓚᐅᖅᓯᒪᕗᖅ ᐃᓗᕕᓕᒻᒥ ᓯᔾᔭᒦᖦᖢᑎᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑐᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖓᓄᑦ. ᐆᑦᑐᕋᐅᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖅ ᑲᔪᓯᓂᖃᑦᑎᐊᓚᐅᙱᒻᒪᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᒌᙱᓐᓂᖏᑦ ᓈᓴᐅᑏᑦ ᐱᖃᓯᐅᔾᔭᐅᓯᒪᙱᑦᑐᑦ ᑕᒡᕙᓂ ᖃᐅᔨᓵᕐᒥ.

29 Narwhal Monitoring Behavioural Response ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᔭᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᓕᖅᑯᓯᕆᓕᖅᑕᖏᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᓂᕐᒨᖓᔪᑦ ᐱᓪᓗᒋᑦ Drone footage of narwhal nursing and resting while vessel is transiting southbound ᖃᖓᑕᑎᑦᑎᒍᑎᓄᑦ ᐃᓄᖃᙱᑦᑐᓄᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓪᓗᑎᑦ ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᐃᕐᓂᐅᕐᕕᖏᑦ ᑕᖃᐃᖅᓯᕐᕕᖏᓪᓗ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᖅ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᓂᒋᐊᓄᑦ 57 Narwhal Monitoring Behavioural Response ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᔭᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᓕᖅᑯᓯᕆᓕᖅᑕᖏᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᓂᕐᒨᖓᔪᑦ ᐱᓪᓗᒋᑦ Drone footage of narwhal nursing and resting while vessel is transiting southbound ᐊᔾᔨᓕᐅᕈᑎ ᖃᖓᑕᔪᖅ ᑕᕐᕋᔭᐅᓯᓕᐅᕈᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᕿᓚᓗᒐᖅ ᐊᒫᒪᒃᑎᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᓴᐃᓕᑎᓪᓗᒍᓗ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᖅ ᓂᒋᖅᐸᓯᐊᓄᙵᐅᕙᓪᓕᓕᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ. [video] 58

30 Shipping - Summary ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᓇᐃᓈᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ Assessment is conservative ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᔾᔪᑎᖏᑦ ᐱᓗᐊᖅᓯᒪᙱᓚᑦ Narwhal continue to use regional study area in numbers consistent with past years in light of increased shipping activities ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᖏᓐᓇᕐᓗᑎᑦ ᑕᐃᑲᓂ ᐊᕕᑦᑐᖅᓯᒪᔪᒦᑦᑐᑦ ᓈᓴᐅᑎᖏᑦ ᐊᔾᔨᒌᖏᓐᓇᕐᒪᑕ ᐊᕐᕌᒎᓯᒪᔪᓂᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᓂᖅᓴᐅᖃᑦᑕᕋᓗᐊᖅᑎᓪᓗᑕ 59 Shipping - Summary ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᓇᐃᓈᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ Narwhal response to vessel-based underwater noise: ᑑᒑᓖᑦ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᐅᕆᐊᓯᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᕐᓄᑦ ᐃᒪᕐᒥ ᓂᐱᖃᕐᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ: Is localised and temporary, across regional study area & for duration of shipping season ᑕᒫᓃᑐᐃᓐᓇᕐᒪᑦ ᓂᐱᖓ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᕿᓚᒥᐅᕙᖦᖢᓂ, ᐊᕕᑦᑐᖅᓯᒪᔪᒥ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᕕᐅᔪᒥ & ᐊᑯᓂᐅᓂᖃᓲᖅ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓇᑐᐊᕐᒥ Unlikely to compromise the integrity of the Baffin Bay Population or Eclipse Sound stock ᑐᖅᓱᑲᑦᑕᕐᒦᑦᑐᑦ ᐊᒥᓲᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᑕᓯᐅᔭᕐᒦᑦᑐᑦ ᐊᒥᓲᓂᖏᑦ ᖃᑦᑏᓐᓇᕈᓗᐊᕐᓂᐊᕋᓱᒋᔭᐅᙱᓚᑦ 60

31 Shipping - Summary ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᓇᐃᓈᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ Mitigation is effective: ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᓗᐊᖅᑕᐃᓕᒪᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᐊᑑᑎᖃᖅᑐᖅ ᐱᖃᓯᐅᑎᓪᓗᒋᑦ ᐅᑯᐊ: Managing transits in heavy ice; ᐊᐅᓚᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐊᖅᑯᑎᖏᑦ ᓯᑯᖃᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ ᐊᒃᓱᑲᓪᓚᒃ; Vessel speed restrictions; ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᓱᒃᑲᓂᖏᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖃᖅᑎᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ; 40 km buffer zone from Nunavut Settlement Area; and, 40 km ᐅᖓᓯᖕᓂᖃᕐᓗᑎᒃ ᓄᓇᕗᑦ ᓄᓇᑖᕆᓯᒪᔭᖓᑕ ᑭᒡᓕᖓᓂᑦ; ᐊᒻᒪᓗ, No-go zones in key calving areas ᐅᐸᒃᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᖏᑦᑐᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ ᐃᓗᐊᓂ ᕿᑐᕐᖏᐅᕐᕕᐅᔪᑦ 61 Shipping - Summary ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᓇᐃᓈᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ Follow-up monitoring, with community, to confirm assessment predictions ᖃᐅᔨᒋᐊᒃᑲᓂᖅᑕᐅᓗᓂ ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᐊᖃᕐᓂᖅ, ᓄᓇᓕᖕᓄᑦ, ᒪᓕᒃᑕᐅᒐᓗᐊᕐᒪᖔᑕ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᓇᓚᐅᑦᑖᖅᑕᐅᓚᐅᖅᑐᑦ Marine Environmental Working Group, community members and regulators engaged on monitoring findings & adaptive measures ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᔭᕆᐊᑭᒡᓕᑎᑦᑎᔨᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᖏᑦ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᒪᓕᒐᕐᓂᒃ ᑲᒪᔨᐅᔪᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᖃᑎᒌᒡᓗᑎᒃ ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᐊᖃᕐᓂᕐᒥᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᔭᐅᔪᓂᒃ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᓂᐊᖅᑐᓄᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖏᓐᓂᒃ 62

32 Technical Review Summary ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎᓂᒃ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᓇᐃᓈᖅᓯᒪᔪᑦ 63 Status of Resolution ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᓕᐅᕈᑎᒋᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᕕᓃᑦ Marine Environment ᐃᒪᑉ ᐊᕙᑎᖓ Resolved / ᐃᓱᒪᓕᐅᕈᑎᒋᔭᐅᓯᒪᔪᑦ, Outstanding / ᑲᒪᒋᔭᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᓱᓕ, 7 Under Review / ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓇᒃᑕᐅᔪᖅ ᒫᓐᓇ, 7 0 TOTAL / ᑲᑎᓕᒫᖅᖢᒋᑦ 64

33 Outstanding and Under Review Marine Environment ᑲᒪᒋᔭᐅᔭᕆᐊᓖᑦ ᓱᓕ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᕿᒥᕐᕈᓇᒃᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᐃᒪᑉ ᐊᕙᑎᖓ Comment Topic / ᐅᖃᐅᓯᒃᓴᖃᕐᕕᒃ ᐱᔾᔪᑎᒥ Ballast Water / ᐃᒪᕐᒨᖅᑕᐅᕙᓪᓕᐊᔪᑦ Marine Environment / ᐃᒪᑉ ᐊᕙᑎᖓ Shipping/ ᐊᓯᑲᖅᑕᕐᓂᖅ Related ID s / ᑐᕌᖓᔪᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᒃᑯᑕᖏᖕᓄᑦ QIA-44, MHTO-5e QIA-43, PCA-02, MHTO-5d PCA-04c, PCA-04b, PCA-04a, MHTO-5b, MHTO-5a, MHTO-4c, MHTO-4b, MHTO-4a, DFO NEW 65 Marine Environment Key Commitments ᑕᕆᐅᕐᒥ ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᔭᐅᔪᒪᓪᓗᐊᑕᖅᑐᑦ Transit Restrictions During Heavier Ice Conditions ᐅᑐᕐᑕᕐᕕᒃ ᐃᓱᒪᖅᓱᕐᓇᖏᓐᓂᖓ ᓯᑯᖃᓗᐊᖅᑎᓪᓗᒍ Establishment of Restricted Shipping Areas ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᖃᕆᐊᖃᖏᑦᑐᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᖅᑕᐅᓗᑎᒃ ᓇᒦᓐᓂᖏᑦ Strict Speed Restrictions ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᓱᒃᑲᓂᖏᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᖅᓱᕐᓇᖏᑦᑐᑦ Dust Suppressant and Mitigations at Milne Port and Stockpile ᐳᔪᖃᓗᐊᕐᔭᐃᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᑲᒻᒪᓗᐊᕐᔭᐃᑎᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᕿᙳᐊᓂ ᑐᓚᑦᑕᕐᕕᒻᒥ ᐊᒻᒪᓗ ᓴᕕᕋᔭᒃᓴᑦ ᐃᓂᖏᖕᓂ End-of-season Narwhal Entrapment Aerial Surveys ᐃᓱᓕᓐᓂᖓ ᕿᓚᓗᒐᑦ ᓯᒃᑯᔾᔨᕕᒋᑐᐃᓐᓇᕆᐊᓕᖏᑕ ᖃᖓᑕᔪᒃᑯᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖅ 66

34 Marine Environment Key Commitments ᑕᕆᐅᕐᒥ ᐊᕙᑎᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᔭᐅᔪᒪᓪᓗᐊᑕᖅᑐᑦ Risk-Based Approach for Ballast Water Ringed Seal Monitoring Management and Monitoring ᓇᑦᑏᑦ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᔭᐅᓂᖏᑦ ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᓯᑐᐃᓐᓇᕆᐊᓕᒃ ᑐᖓᕕᒋᓪᓗᒍ ᖃᓄᖅᑑᕈᑎᑦ Avoidance of North Water Polynya ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᐅᕕᔾᔭᐃᒃᑯᑎᑕᖓ ᐃᒪᖃᐅᑎᓕᕆᔭᐅᓂᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᐊᐅᒃᑲᓐᓂᓖᑦ ᐅᐸᒃᑕᐅᔭᕆᐊᖃᖏᓐᓂᖏᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓂᖏᓐᓄᓪᓗ Development of Inuit Stewardship Plan Monitoring for Early-Warning Indicator ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᐸᐸᑦᑎᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᐸᕐᓇᐅᑎᓕᐊᕆᔭᐅᓗᓂ ᐅᐊᑦᑎᓂᖅ ᓯᕗᓂᐊᒍᑦ ᐅᓗᕆᐊᓇᖅᑐᒨᓛᕐᓂᐊᕋᓱᒋᔭᐅᓕᕐᓂᖏᖕᓄᑦ ᓇᓗᓇᐃᒃᑯᑎᖏᑦ QIA approval of Adaptive Management ᒪᓕᑦᑕᐅᓗᑎᑦ ᕿᑭᖅᑕᓂ ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᑲᑐᔾᔨᖃᑎᒌᖏᑦ ᐊᖏᖅᓯᓗᑎᒃ ᐋᕿᒋᐊᕐᕕᖃᐃᓐᓇᖅᑐᒥᒃ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᕐᒥᒃ 67 Project Certificate Conditions ᐱᓕᕆᐊᑉ ᐃᓕᓴᕆᔭᐅᔾᔪᑎᖓᑕ ᖃᓄᐃᓕᖓᔭᕆᐊᖃᕐᓂᖏᑦ 68

35 Current Project Certificate Conditions ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᒫᓐᓇᐅᔪᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᒧᑦ ᐃᓕᓴᕆᔭᐅᔾᔪᑎᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖏᑦ General Marine Environment ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᐅᕚᔾᔭᐃᒃᑯᑖᑕ ᐃᒪᖓ (#86-91; ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᕐᓗᒍ 87 & 89; (#76; Remove since completed) ᐲᕐᓗᒍ 90 & 91) ᑕᕆᐅᑉ ᐊᕙᑎᐊᑕ ᖃᓄᐃᓐᓂᖓ (#76; ᐱᔭᕇᖅᑕᐅᑎᓪᓗᒍ Spill Prevention (#92-98; Remove #92 & 96) ᐲᖅᑕᐅᓚᐅᖅᑐᖅ) ᑯᕕᑦᑕᐃᓕᒪᑎᑦᑎᔾᔪᑎ (#92-98; ᐲᕐᓗᒍ #92 & 96) Marine Working Group (#77; no change) Supplemental Baseline Assessments ᐃᒪᕐᒥᐅᑕᓕᕆᓂᕐᒧᑦ ᐱᔭᕆᐊᑭᒡᓕᑎᑦᑎᔨᑦ ᑲᑎᒪᔨᖏᑦ (#77; (#99-100; Update #99) ᐊᓯᔾᔨᖏᑦᑐᖅ) ᐃᓚᒋᐊᕈᑎ ᑭᒡᓕᖓᓂᒃ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᐃᓂᕐᒧᑦ (#99-100; ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᕐᓗᒍ #99) Icebreaking and Shipping (#78-80; Update 78) Monitoring (#101 ; Update to streamline and reduce ᓯᑯᒥᒃ ᓱᕋᑦᑎᕆᓂᖅ ᐊᒻᒪ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᕐᓂᖅ ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᒃᑯᑦ (#78-80; repetition) ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᖅᑕᖅ 78) ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᐃᓂᖅ (#101 ; ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᕐᓗᒍ ᐋᖅᑭᑦᑎᐊᖁᓪᓗᒍ ᐊᒻᒪ Shoreline Effects and Sediment Redistribution (#81-85; ᐅᓄᖅᑐᐃᖅᓱᖁᓇᒍ) Remove 81, update 82, Remove 83(a) and 84) ᓯᒡᔭᒥᒃ ᐊᒃᑐᐃᓂᖓ ᐊᒻᒪ ᐃᖅᑲᖓᓂᒃ ᐊᓯᐊᓄᑦ ᓇᒧᓐᖔᖃᖅᑎᕆᓂᖅ (#81-85; ᐲᕐᓗᒍ 81, ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᖅᑕᐅᓪᓗᓂ 82, ᐱᕐᓗᒋᑦ 83(a) ᐊᒻᒪ 84) Ballast Water (#86-91; Update 87 & 89; Remove 90 & 91) 69 Current Project Certificate Conditions ᐊᑐᖅᑕᐅᔪᑦ ᒫᓐᓇᐅᔪᖅ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᒧᑦ ᐃᓕᓴᕆᔭᐅᔾᔪᑎᑦ ᒪᓕᒐᖏᑦ Traffic Log and Shipping Information (# ; remove 102&104; update 103) ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑦ ᐃᖏᕐᕋᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᑎᑎᕋᖅᐸᓪᓕᐊᓂᖅ ᐊᒻᒪ ᐅᓯᖃᖅᑕᖅᑕᖏᓐᓄᑦ ᑐᓴᒐᒃᓴᑦ (# ; ᐲᕐᓗᒍ 102&104; ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᕐᓗᒍ 103) Shipboard Observers (# ; update 106 and remove ) ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᕐᒥ ᓇᐅᑦᑎᖅᓱᖅᑏᑦ (# ; ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᕐᓗᒍ 106 ᐊᒻᒪ ᐲᕐᓗᒍ ) Ship Noise ( ; update 110 and remove to remove duplication) ᐅᒥᐊᕐᔪᐊᑉ ᓂᐹᕿᓂᖓ ( ; ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᕐᓗᒍ 110 ᐊᒻᒪ ᐲᕐᓗᒍ ᑎᑭᓪᓗᒍ ᐲᕐᓗᒍ ᒪᕐᕈᐊᖅᑎᖅᓯᒪᔪᓐᓃᕐᓂᐊᕐᒪᑦ) Arctic Char (# ; remove 115) ᐃᖃᓗᐃᑦ (# ; ᐲᕐᓗᒍ 115) Blasting (# ; update 116 and remove ᖄᖅᑎᕆᓂᖅ (# ; ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᕐᓗᒍ 116 ᐊᒻᒪ ᐲᕐᓗᒍ ) Ringed Seals (#119; update) / ᓇᑦᑏᑦ (#119; ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᕐᓗᒍ) Marine Mammal Interactions (# ; update 121&124; Remove 122&123) ᐳᐃᔨᓂᒃ ᐆᒪᔪᓂᒃ ᓵᓐᖓᒃᓯᖃᑦᑕᕐᓂᖏᑦ (# ; ᓄᑖᕈᕆᐊᕐᓗᒍ 121&124; ᐲᕐᓗᒍ 122&123) Public Engagement (# ; Remove ) ᑭᓇᒃᑯᓕᒫᑦ ᐱᓕᕆᖃᑕᐅᑎᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ (# ; ᐲᕐᓗᒍ ) 70

36 Assessment Summary ᖃᐅᔨᓵᖑᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᓇᐃᓈᖅᓯᒪᓂᖏᑦ 71 Assessment Conclusions ᖃᐅᔨᓵᖑᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᐃᓱᒪᓕᐅᕈᑕᐅᓂᖏᑦ Phase 2 assessment on marine environment is robust, includes: ᑭᖑᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᒍᑎᒋᔭᐅᓂᐊᕐᓂᖓᓄᑦ ᑕᕆᐅᑉ ᐊᕙᑎᖓ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᖅᑕᐅᓗᓂ ᐱᓕᕆᐊᖃᕈᓘᔭᖅᑐᒻᒪᕆᐅᓂᐊᖅᐳᒍᑦ, ᐱᖃᐅᓯᐅᑎᓗᒋᑦ ᐅᑯᐊ: Inuit knowledge & Science ᐃᓄᐃᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᒪᓂᖏᑦ & ᑭᒡᓕᓯᓂᐊᖅᑐᓕᕆᔨᒃᑯᓪᓗ Conservatism ᐸᐸᑦᑎᓂᖅ Knowledge gained from current operations ᖃᐅᔨᒪᔭᐅᓕᕐᓂᖏᑦ ᑕᐃᑲᙵᑦ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᕐᒥᒃ Evidence from other Arctic operations show shipping & marine mammals successfully co-exist ᓇᓗᓇᐃᒃᑯᑏᑦ ᑕᐃᑲᙶᖅᑐᑦ ᐊᓯᖏᖕᓂᑦ ᐅᑭᐅᖅᑕᖅᑐᒥ ᐊᐅᓚᑦᑎᓂᖏᑦ ᑕᑯᒃᓴᐅᑎᑦᑎᓯᒪᕗᑦ ᐅᓯᑲᖅᑕᓂᖅ & ᐳᐃᔩᑦ ᑕᐃᑲᓂᒃᓴᐃᓐᓈᕈᓐᓇᕐᒪᑕ With mitigation, no significant residual effects to Marine Environment or Marine Mammals ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᑲᒻᒪᔾᔭᐃᖅᑎᑦᑎᓗᑕ, ᐃᒪᕐᒥᒃ ᐅᕝᕙᓘᓐᓃᑦ ᐳᐃᔨᓂᑦ ᐊᑦᑐᐃᓂᖃᑲᒻᒪᑯᑖᒃᓯᔪᖃᕐᓂᐊᙱᓚᖅ Comprehensive Phase 2 assessment with notable input from Inuit/communities ᑕᒪᐃᓐᓂᓗ ᑭᖑᓪᓕᕐᒥ ᐱᕙᓪᓕᐊᔾᔪᑎᒃᓴᕗᑦ ᖃᐅᔨᓴᕐᓗᒍ ᑐᓴᕆᐊᕐᕕᖃᕐᒥᓗᑕ ᐅᖃᐅᓯᒃᓴᖏᑦ ᐱᖃᓯᐅᑎᒻᒥᓗᒋᑦ ᐃᓄᖕᓂᒃ/ᓄᓇᓕᐅᔪᓂᑦ 72

37 Thank you ᖁᔭᓐᓇᒦᒃ CORPORATE OFFICE 2275 Upper Middle Road East, Suite 300 Oakville, Ontario, Canada L6H 0C3 Tel: NORTHERN HEAD OFFICE Building 622, Iqaluit House, Suite 102 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 73